Center for Medical Integrity

Center for Medical Integrity was formed to hold doctors and other healthcare providers accountable for the standard of care they give to patients. Medical abuse, especially in the form of Medical Gaslighting, has become just as standard practice as checking the blood pressure of a patient, and this often leads to a massive amount of psychological, emotional, AND physical harm. Healthcare providers are not being educated on the dangers of medical gaslighting, and most doctors don’t seem to use the scientific method before drawing conclusions. Instead, they often jump to conclusions, much of the time due to their own personal prejudices. They do not take the time to do their due diligence to test out their hypothesis.

Every patient has the right to be treated with care and respect, no matter what type of insurance they have or whether they are paying out of pocket. Lower-income individuals utilizing the Medicaid Program and other state-sponsored insurance are the most targeted individuals when it comes to medical abuse.

Mission

Educate doctors and healthcare practitioners, clinics, hospitals, and wellness centers about medical abuse and medical gaslighting.

Hold doctors and healthcare practitioners, clinics, hospitals, and wellness centers accountable for medical abuse, including medical gaslighting, which is a form of psychological abuse.

Promote the use of the scientific method to medical professionals and medical institutions for drawing conclusions in order to avoid jumping to conclusions based on personal prejudices.

What is Medical Gaslighting?

According to the CPTSD Foundation, medical gaslighting is defined as occurring when a doctor or medical professional dismisses or trivializes a person’s health concerns based on the assumption they are mentally ill. They may tell the person their symptoms are “in their head,” for example.

A 2009 study found that doctors were twice as likely to attribute coronary heart disease symptoms in middle-aged women to mental health conditions than middle-aged men.

Gaslighting is a form of psychological abuse where a person or group makes someone question their sanity, perception of reality, or memories. People experiencing gaslighting often feel confused, anxious, and unable to trust themselves.

The term gaslighting derives from the 1938 play and 1944 film Gaslight, in which a husband manipulates his wife into thinking she has a mental illness by dimming their gas-fueled lights and telling her she is hallucinating.

Gaslighting often develops gradually, making it difficult for a person to detect. According to the National Domestic Violence Hotline, techniques a person may use to gaslight someone includes:

  • Countering: This describes a person questioning someone’s memories. They may say things such as simple as “are you sure?” or “It can’t be that bad, can it?”

  • Withholding: When someone withholds, they refuse to engage in a conversation. A person using this technique may move on to the next subject or refuse to adequately address a patient’s concerns.

  • Trivializing: This occurs when a person belittles or disregards the other person’s experiences. They may accuse them of being too sensitive or of overreacting when they are reporting valid symptoms.

  • Denial: Denial involves bluntly telling someone, “What you are experiencing is not real,” or something similar.

  • Diverting: With this technique, a person changes the focus of a discussion and questions the other person’s credibility instead.

  • Stereotyping: An article in the American Sociological Review states that a person using gaslighting techniques may intentionally use negative stereotypes of a person’s gender, race, ethnicity, sexuality, class, nationality, or age to manipulate them. For example, they may tell a female that people will think she is irrational or crazy if she seeks help for abuse.

While anyone can experience gaslighting, it is especially common in social interactions where there is an imbalance of power.

A person who is on the receiving end of this behavior is experiencing abuse.

Signs of Gaslighting

People on the receiving end of gaslighting often find it difficult to realize they are experiencing abuse. They may not question the abusive person’s behavior because they are in a position of authority, or because they feel reliant on them.

The National Domestic Violence Hotline indicate that a person experiencing gaslighting may:

  • • Feel confused and constantly second-guess themselves

  • • Find it difficult to make simple decisions

  • • Frequently question if they are too sensitive

  • • Constantly apologize to the abusive person

  • • Feel hopeless, joyless, worthless, or incompetent

Gaslighting can also cause anxiety, depression, and psychological trauma, especially if it is part of a wider abuse pattern.

Due Diligence

In order to avoid gaslighting patients, doctors and other healthcare practitioners can simply stick to using the scientific method to draw conclusions rather than relying on their assumptions, which may be based on unconscious biases and prejudices. Most doctors and healthcare practitioners have an extremely busy schedule, so it’s all too easy for them to jump to conclusions in order to get onto the next patient. This is a very dangerous habit, however, and steps must be taken to ensure due diligence with every single patient under a doctor’s care. Every single patient is a precious life and should be treated with the utmost care.

Solution: Use the Scientific Method

The Scientific method is a process to investigate, verify, or construct an accurate and reliable version of any phenomena. They are done by creating an objective framework for the purpose of scientific inquiry and analyzing the results scientifically to come to a conclusion that either supports or contradicts the initial assumption.

QUESTION > COLLECT DATA > TEST HYPOTHESIS > CONCLUSION

How most doctors currently come to conclusions:

QUESTION > MAKE ASSUMPTIONS WITH NO EVIDENCE > CONCLUSION

We assert that doctors, healthcare practitioners, and health institutions adhere to the following two principles without any tolerance for anything less:

  1. Use the Scientific Method to come to conclusions when evaluating patients.

  2. Never abuse patients, including psychological abuse such as medical gaslighting.

Example #1

STEP 1: Question: Is my patient imagining their symptoms?

STEP 2: Collect Data:

  • Take a thorough medical history of the patient. Do they have any previous history of delusional episodes or other related psychiatric conditions?

  • Ask the patient to describe the onset and progression of the symptoms.

  • Make objective observations.

  • Order relevant diagnostic tests and if they are inconclusive or normal, research what tests may be more relevant, even tests that aren’t standardly done.

  • Consider seeking input from other medical specialists

  • Encourage open communication and active listening to understand what the patient is conveying – patient input is valuable for a holistic understanding. Allow the patient to submit a report or timeline in writing, if they choose to, and actually read it to understand it thoroughly.

STEP 3: Test Hypothesis: Before coming to the conclusion that a patient is delusional, test that hypothesis. Are there other areas of their life where they are experiencing delusions? The primary and most prominent feature of Delusional Disorder is the presence of delusions that involve themes such as persecution, grandiosity, jealousy, and erotomania (believing someone else is in love with them), so if a patient is delusional about their symptoms, they are likely to be experiencing these kinds of themes, as well.

Consider that Delusional Disorder is estimated to affect only 1 - 3 people out of every 100,000, so there’s only a 0.05 - 0.1% chance that your patient is delusional. If you are assuming that more than 1 - 3 of your patients out of every 100,000 you see are delusional, then it’s more likely that you are the problem, rather than them.

STEP 4: Conclusion: Do you have enough evidence to show that your patient is delusional and only imagining their symptoms? If you do have enough evidence to show that your patient is delusional, then act accordingly. If not, you should do everything you can to help them and figure out what is really going on with them. New discoveries are always being made and you may need to educate yourself further about what could possibly be going on with them if something is not completely apparent.

Example #2

STEP 1: Question: Does my patient actually have an anxiety disorder?

STEP 2: Collect Data: Determining whether or not a patient has an anxiety disorder entails the following:

  • Review the patient’s medical history.

  • Inquire about the patient’s psychiatric history.

  • Ask about the patient’s family history.

  • Explore traumas experienced in childhood that could have trained the patient’s brain to become anxious for illogical reasons, such as just feeling excited or happy. All humans experience anxiety when warranted, but an anxiety disorder is an experience of anxiety when it’s not warranted.

  • Inquire about any physical symptoms such as palpitations, sweating, trembling, or gastrointestinal distress associated with anxiety disorders.

  • Evaluate sleep patterns.

  • Assess the patient’s cognitive functioning, including their ability to concentrate and make decisions.

  • Inquire about the patient’s use of alcohol, drugs, or other harmful substances.

  • Observe the patient’s behavior and body language during an evaluation for anxiety disorder, watching for restlessness, fidgeting, avoidance of eye contact, or other physical signs.

  • Implement standardized anxiety assessment tools or questionaires to gather more objective data about the patient’s mental state.

  • Establish open communication and a supportive rapport with the patient. Sometimes, individuals may not recognize or express their anxiety until they feel comfortable discussing their feelings.

STEP 3: Test Hypothesis: Before coming to the conclusion that a patient has an anxiety disorder, test that hypothesis. Evaluate the data you have collected. A patient simply reporting Multiple Chemical Sensitivity, for example, does NOT indicate an anxiety disorder, for example. MCS is very real and disabling. You should never jump to the conclusion of anxiety disorder just because it’s easier to do so or because you’ve come across something you haven’t taken the time to understand yet. Collect and properly evaluate all the data listed above before making you conclusion.

An estimated 3.6% of the world population have an anxiety disorder, so that will be about 3 - 4 people out of every 100 patients you see, and most people with anxiety disorders are very aware that they get anxious too often and for reasons that do not warrant it. I

STEP 4: Conclusion: Do you have enough evidence to show that your patient has an anxiety disorder? If you do have enough evidence to show that your patient has an anxiety disorder, then act accordingly. If not, you should do everything you can to help them and figure out what is really going on with them rather than just dismissing all of their symptoms as “anxiety.” New discoveries are always being made and you may need to educate yourself further about what could possibly be going on with them if something is not completely apparent.

Schedule an Interview

Are you someone who has experienced Medical Abuse, including Medical Gaslighting? I want to interview you!

If you would like to be interviewed on video via Zoom and include your story on our channel for Narcissistic Medical Abuse Accountability & Recovery, you can schedule a time to be interviewed at the following link:

Our goal is to create accountability for abusive doctors so they will think twice before abusing patients – gaslighting, which is extremely common, is psychological abuse. Currently, there are NO consequences for abusive doctors. Let's create one. Please help by sharing your story.

Music by the powerful

DANISOGEN